ARTICLE TYPE : RESEARCH ARTICLE
Published on : 02 Sep 2026,
Volume - 2
Journal Title :
WebLog Journal of Depression and Anxiety
| WebLog J Depress Anxiety
| WJDA
Source URL:
https://weblogoa.com/articles/wjda.2026.i0203
Permanent Identifier (DOI) :
The Psychology of Procrastination in Students
Abstract
Background: Academic procrastination, defined as the voluntary delay of intended academic tasks despite potential harm, is exceedingly common among students. It is conceptualized as a failure of self-regulation and motivation that leads to negative outcomes in performance and well-being.
Objective: This review synthesizes contemporary research on student procrastination, covering definitions, prevalence (global and India), theoretical models, correlates (personality, mental health), cognitive mechanisms, situational factors, measurement tools, and interventions (with effect sizes).
Methods: We examined recent peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses, and official data. Topics addressed include temporal motivation theory, expectancy-value, emotion regulation models, self regulation failure, executive function deficits, and perfectionism. We also review evidence on the Big Five traits, ADHD, anxiety/depression, task factors, and digital distractions.
Findings: Approximately half to three-quarters of students admit to frequent procrastination. Procrastination is negatively correlated with conscientiousness and emotional stability, and positively with impulsivity and perfectionistic self-doubt. It moderately correlates with anxiety/ depression (r≈0.3). Temporal Motivation Theory effectively predicts procrastination via expectancy, value, delay, and impulsivity parameters (Steel, 2007) [1]. Cognitive-behavioral interventions show moderate efficacy (mean g≈0.55 for CBT), and implementation intentions yield moderate-to-large gains (d≈0.65). Implications: These findings support multifaceted interventions combining CBT techniques, motivational support, and time-management training. Ethical considerations include avoiding stigma, ensuring informed consent for digital monitoring, and cultural sensitivity.
Limitations: The field relies heavily on self-report and cross-sectional data; experimental and longitudinal studies are needed.
Conclusion: Procrastination in students is well-studied as a self-regulatory failure with measurable correlates and treatable via evidence-based methods. Educators should implement supportive strategies (e.g. structured deadlines, training) to mitigate its academic and psychological costs.
Citation
Chawa Nandini Meghana. The Psychology of Procrastination in Students. WebLog J Depress Anxiety. wjda.2026.i0203. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22539055