📢 Publish Your Research for Free - Full APC Waiver, No Hidden Charges. Submit Your Article Today! Submit Now →
JImage

ARTICLE TYPE : RESEARCH ARTICLE

Published on :   18 May 2026, Volume - 2
Journal Title :   WebLog Journal of Community Medicine | WebLog J Community Med | WJCM
Source URL:   weblog icon https://weblogoa.com/articles/wjcm.2026.e1801
Permanent Identifier (DOI) :   doi icon https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20329043

Instructor Presence Stabilizes Performance Distributions in Digitally Scaffolded CPR Training

Felix Hoepfl 1 *
1Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Rosenheim, Germany

Abstract

Background: Digital feedback systems are increasingly integrated into school-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training. Prior research has largely emphasized mean performance outcomes, whereas assessment theory suggests that distributional characteristics—particularly lower-tail reliability—may be equally relevant in safety-critical competence contexts.

Purpose: This study examined whether different instructional configurations under digitally scaffolded CPR training—peer-led and adult-led instruction—differ in distributional properties of performance, and how these formats compare to a minimal-scaffolding digital-only configuration.

Methods: A quasi-experimental comparative design was conducted across three conditions: peer led instruction (n = 342), adult-led instruction (n = 69; individual-level subsample), and digital-only training without instructor guidance during assessment (n = 23). Mechanical CPR performance was assessed using QCPR-enabled manikins generating composite percentage scores. Non-parametric tests were used to compare distributions and frequencies of catastrophic low-performance cases (<50%), operationalized as lower-tail competence failures.

Results: Mean performance was comparable across groups (Peer: 84.45%; Adult: 83.54%; Digital only: 82.52%). However, distributional differences emerged. Catastrophic lower-tail failures occurred exclusively in the digital-only condition (3/23; 13.0%) and were absent in instructor present formats. Overall group differences were statistically significant (H = 11.38, p = .003), with pairwise contrasts indicating differences between instructor-present and digital-only conditions, but not between peer-led and adult-led instruction.

Conclusions: Although mean performance did not differ, instructor-present formats were associated with reduced lower-tail vulnerability. From an assessment perspective, distributional integrity may therefore complement mean-based interpretations when evaluating instructional effects in safety critical skills training.

Keywords: CPR Training; Peer Instruction; Distributional Performance; Instructional Scaffolding; Health Professions Education; Competence Assessment; Simulation-Based Learning

Citation

Felix Hoepfl. Instructor Presence Stabilizes Performance Distributions in Digitally Scaffolded CPR Training. WebLog J Community Med. wjcm.2026. e1801. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20329043