ARTICLE TYPE : REVIEW ARTICLE
Published on : 06 Apr 2026, Volume - 2
Journal Title :
WebLog Journal of Genetics and Genomic Research | WebLog J Genet Genomic Res
Source URL:
https://weblogoa.com/articles/wjggr.2026.d0602
Permanent Identifier (DOI) :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652606
Synthetic Biology: Paradigm Revolution or Philosophical Eclipse? From Bacillus subtilis Genomics to Direct Design
2Department of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Abstract
Synthetic biology represents a profound transformation in the life sciences, shifting from reactive genetic manipulation to proactive, design-driven construction of biological systems. Using Bacillus subtilis genomics as a historical anchor, we trace the conceptual trajectory from genetic engineering through molecular biology to synthetic biology (SynBio), framing each transition through Thomas Kuhn’s theory of paradigm shifts. We argue that SynBio constitutes a genuine revolutionary paradigm: Jacob’s genetic program has become executable and editable through CRISPR, Hutchison et al.'s minimal genome (Syn3.0) defines the boundary between life and deliberate design and cheap DNA synthesis has compressed experimental timelines from months to days. However, this revolution carries the risk of a philosophical eclipse, the reduction of biological inquiry to pipeline optimization, unless accompanied by critical engagement with the perspectives of Keller, Haraway, and Jonas on emergence, ethics, and responsibility. We conclude that SynBio advances scientific understanding only insofar as it deepens, rather than bypasses, our engagement with the complexity of living systems.
Keywords: Synthetic Biology; Paradigm Shift; CRISPR-Cas9; Minimal Genome; Philosophy of Science; Bacillus subtilis
Citation
Batista de Araújo MR, Ashniev G, Viegas Santos RC and Azevedo V. Synthetic Biology: Paradigm Revolution or Philosophical Eclipse? From Bacillus subtilis Genomics to Direct Design. WebLog J Genet Genomic Res. wjggr.2026.d0602. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652606